Skip to content

Shai Linne

November 10, 2009

This weekend Westminster Presbyterian Church (our church here in Lancaster) hosted what was a most unusual event for our congregation.  In the middle of our 18th Century Puritan meeting-house style sanctuary, we hosted a hip hop concert.  It was the kind of cultural clash that I know the Lord loves to see happen.  A church of predominately white middle/upper class folks opening up their sanctuary to a hip hop artist from Philadelphia is the kind of cultural line crossing that should be happening in the Church today and its the kind of event that stretches congregations to the point of discomfort, and that’s good for everybody when such stretching is Biblically based.

I personally was most moved by the event.  For those who may be unfamiliar with Shai Linne, his style of hip hop (which he calls “lyrical theology”) is jam-packed with Reformed goodies.  He can define and defend a doctrine of the Reformed faith in a four-minute song better than some preachers can do it in an hour.  How many hip hop artists do you know are out there penning songs about limited atonement or total depravity?  How many do you know are outlining the covenant of grace in their songs?  How many hip hop songs have you heard that resemble a chapter of John Owen’s, “The Death of Death in the Death of Christ”?  Shai does all this and more.  His songs aren’t just lessons in theology, they come across as love songs for the Church.  Yes, its his passion for the bride of Christ that made Shai Linne’s performance so stirring.  He spoke of Christ’s bride being multi cultural.  He spoke of the preaching of the Word of God as the true means in which the Church engages culture.  He shared his passion for the purity of Christ’s bride and the dangers of a Church who bends and shapes itself to culture pointing out that, “those who hate God’s Truth won’t hate it any less just because you set it to hip hop beats or have a rock band presenting it.”

For me though, the most moving thing about the event were the testimonies shared after the concert by those in our church who went in skeptical of the event.  After Shai’s concert pastor Troy Debruin invited Shai out to share his testimony and then opened up the floor for any questions.  At one point Shai asked if anyone was there who was skeptical of the event.  He asked if they would share their thoughts on the concert having now experienced it.  Several shared their experiences and all of them were positive, but the one who stirred me the most was the congregant who said, “Westminster is very deliberate about making our sanctuary into a reverent place of worship.  I was most concerned about a lack of reverence in this concert.  However, after seeing it, I have to say this was one of the most moving events I’ve ever attended here.”  I couldn’t agree more.  I’ve been to hundreds of concerts in my lifetime of all sorts.  I’ve never seen a concert, even at Westminster, which had that level of both theological substance and reverence.  Shai wouldn’t agree with what I’m about to say as he’s made himself clear that his music is not intended to supplement preaching, but going to that concert in my mind equated to listening to an hour long sermon set to beats and bass lines.  It was truly an amazing event.

Check out Shai Linne’s music or read his blog, “Lyrical Theology

12 Comments leave one →
  1. November 11, 2009 11:59 pm

    That’s a trip and a half! A very strange happening for the white meeting house.

    -g-

  2. November 12, 2009 9:11 am

    The good news gets carried in a lot of different types of vessels doesn’t it? Sadly, a lot of Christians can only see the mass produced vessels and spew criticism at anything that’s different. Sounds like a good time. I wonder if Rush was singing about the other side of Reformed theology when they sang “I will choose Free Will.”

  3. November 12, 2009 9:53 am

    Rush-the great Weslyan evangelists!

  4. Troy permalink
    November 12, 2009 9:18 pm

    well put Andy. I couldn’t agree with you more! thanks for coming and helping out.

  5. Kim Seldomridge permalink
    November 12, 2009 11:37 pm

    Thanks Andy. It was well said. Any chance Heidi can get your article in the communique? Kim

  6. November 13, 2009 9:10 am

    Um…I wouldn’t know the first thing about any of that. You’ll have to ask my wife I guess! I certainly don’t think its THAT good.

  7. Stephen Sarro permalink
    November 13, 2009 9:09 pm

    Rush kicks ass!!!!

  8. November 16, 2009 12:56 am

    Andy, you seriously underestimate your ability to 1.) write and 2.) defend Christianity. Honestly, you’re one of the smartest laymen I’ve ever met. It wouldn’t be a stretch to mistakenly believe you’d gone to seminary. I’m extremely grateful for your knowledge in the Lord.

  9. November 16, 2009 9:19 am

    Dude…you need to hang around seminarians then because I never feel so dumb as when I’m w/ those guys. There’s a HUGE gap between seminarians and me. Its HUGE. HUUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGEEEEE. I thank you for your kind words but I just don’t see that. I can introduce you to at least 10 laymen who are far beyond my intellect at Westminster in about 5 minutes. Keep coming to Westminster, you’ll see that I’m not so smart haha!

  10. February 28, 2011 9:51 am

    Quite a new low for the reformed world. I would like to know how anyone thinking they are “reformed” could support this obvious compromise with the lowest element of American entertainment culture. As a parent I teach my children that rapp, rock and pop are not for the child of God. Rapp’s origins are from the pit of the black gangster, druggy, welfare culture! What are you people thinking?!! Just before you call me a racist, rock music comes also from the 60′s white, hippie, sex and drugs culture (though they say rock actually has its roots in black music and was popularized by men like Elvis). I want pure kids not “christianized” versions of the worldly heathen/hedonistic culture. What reformer would endorse such a thing? none. You know, the Reformers left the Roman Catholic church because they realized that it was shot through with paganism/heathenism. Looks like its time for a new Reformation! You should be ashamed!

  11. February 28, 2011 12:19 pm

    Honestly, Michel, I thought this was a joke when I first started reading, haha! Sigh. Although I understand your point I don’t agree with it because it’s discriminatory by definition. And if you want pure kids you’ll have to take them back before the fall to accomplish that!

  12. March 8, 2011 2:46 pm

    Wow I would go back and reread the Reformers, particularly the Puritans, Michel. They saw no line between the “sacred” and the “secular”. Is God not sovereign over artforms coming out of the ghetto, hippy movement, ect? Are musical STYLES inherently evil? There’s no Scripture to back such a claim. I would quote Larry Norman. “If you got a Scripture, just show it to my face.”

    Fanny Crosby, a very popular hymn writer, often times set her hymns to popular melodies of her day. What’s the difference between that and writing songs to and about Christ set to a certain genre? Is classical music any less corrupt, given the total lack of piety in the lives of many classical composers?

    Also your history on Rock and Roll is iffy. Elvis made it popular, but that doesn’t change its roots, the Black churches of the South. In fact, Little Richard once said, “All Elvis did was make popular the music we were already playing in church.”

    I would also check your contextualization of Church History. The Reformers split w/ the RCC because of DOCTRINAL issues, particularly over justification. To apply that to a genre of music is fairly ridiculous, isn’t it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.